Germany promised Ukraine weapons but hasn’t delivered. Now, anger toward Berlin is rising

Ukraine’s relations with Germany have soured this week, with Kyiv asking why Berlin reneged on its promise to provide heavy weaponry.

Tensions over Germany’s provision of Leopard tanks and infantry fighting vehicles to Ukraine — or lack thereof — came to a head this week when Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, publicly asked why Berlin was backtracking on a pledge made to send these weapons to Ukraine.

“Disappointing signals from Germany while Ukraine needs Leopards and Marders now — to liberate people and save them from genocide,” Kuleba said on Twitter, adding that there was “not a single rational argument on why these weapons can not be supplied, only abstract fears and excuses.”

“What is Berlin afraid of that Kyiv is not?” he added.

The Marder is a German infantry fighting vehicle designed to be used alongside Leopard battle tanks in combat.

Kuleba’s comments came as Ukraine launches counterattacks against Russian forces in both the south and northeast of the country. Ukraine’s counterattack in the northeast Kharkiv region was hailed as a particular success, with Russian forces withdrawing from towns and villages across the region, almost completely deoccupying it.

Ukraine is largely reliant on Western weapons systems to fight Russian forces. And its allies in the West, NATO members essentially, have individually sent Ukraine a vast range of military hardware.

In April, Germany promised to give Leopard tanks and Marders to Ukraine. Rather than deliver them directly, it proposed a swap scheme. The intention was that NATO members, Poland or Slovakia for example, could send Ukraine older Soviet-era tanks (such as Leopard 1s), and Germany would then replenish their stocks with its own more modern equivalent weapons (such as Leopard 2s).

Germany justified the proposal to send older weapons by saying that Ukraine’s forces were used to Soviet-era weapons, and that it should only supply weapons they know how to use.

The only problem with the plan is that this exchange of weapons has largely failed to materialize and Germany is now facing a backlash from critics, both within Germany and externally — and not least of all, from a disappointed Ukraine.

Yuriy Sak, an advisor to Ukraine’s defense minister, Oleksii Reznikov, told CNBC on Wednesday that Kyiv doesn’t understand Berlin’s reluctance to send it weapons that could prove decisive on the battlefield.

“It’s difficult to read their minds, but Germany’s words, during the last seven months on a number of occasions, have not been matched by their actions. And this is disappointing because there was a moment in time when they made this commitment that they would provide Ukraine with these tanks, it was a moment of hope and promise that we looked forward to,” he noted.

“If they’re afraid of some nuclear strikes or some other attacks on the nuclear power plant in Zaporizhzhia, which could result in major tragedy, it’s another story but as far as the situation on the battlefield is concerned, we don’t understand the logic behind it. It could be some internal political games as well,” he noted.

Ukraine’s need for more weapons comes as the war enters what could be a definitive phase in which the balance shifts in Kyiv’s favor.

They note on their site that, to date, these deliveries include a number of Gepard SPAAGs (self-propelled anti-aircraft guns), man-portable air defense systems (known as MANPADS, they’re portable surface-to-air missiles), howitzers, and anti-tank weapons, as well as hundreds of vehicles and millions of rounds of ammunition. The German government has also published a list of the military equipment it has sent to Ukraine, right down to 125 pairs of binoculars it has donated.

But when it comes to German tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, Germany has ostensibly dragged its feet, with no decision on the supply of such hardware, let alone deliveries, made despite Ukraine’s specific requests from Kuleba and other officials since March. Analysts say Germany’s good intentions have just not come to fruition.

“Germany has … attempted to entice other countries to send their heavy weaponry to Ukraine in a programme known as ‘Ringtausch’ (‘exchange’). Under this policy, countries can receive German armament free of charge in exchange for delivering tanks and infantry fighting vehicles from own stocks to Ukraine,” Mitzer and Oliemans noted in an article in early September.

“Although a promising scheme at first, the ‘Ringtausch’ programme has largely failed to live up to expectations as most countries expect to have their Soviet-era systems replaced by larger numbers of modern weapon systems than what Berlin is currently able (or willing) to offer,” they noted.

“It’s not so simple just to say: I’ll just risk that we won’t be able to act, the defense of the country, by giving everything away. No, I won’t do that,” she said. “But we have other possibilities, from industry, with our partners,” Deutsche Welle reported.

CNBC contacted the German Defense Ministry for more comment, and a response to Kuleba’s comments, and is yet to receive a response.

Scholz defended Germany’s record over weapons deliveries on Wednesday, however, telling reporters that “it can be said that the very weapons that Germany has now provided to Ukraine are decisive to the development of the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and they have also made the difference” in battle.

Germany’s reticence over certain arms deliveries has prompted some critics to look for ulterior motives for its reluctance, with some even suggesting that Germany does not like the idea of German tanks facing Russian tanks on the battlefield, as they did in World War II.

Rafael Loss, a defense expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told CNBC Wednesday that the German government has put forward various explanations for not sending the weapons.

“The German government itself has put forward explanations for why not to do so, essentially, since the beginning of Russia’s war against Ukraine and even before that. We’ve heard concerns about the potential for escalation, that Russia might see the transfer of such weapons as some kind of red line.”

“We see concerns, mostly from the SPD (Scholz’s Social Democratic Party) about the images that German Leopard tanks might produce going toe to toe with Russian tanks in Ukraine. And we’ve also heard in the past arguments about the tight timeline as a reason for sending the Soviet-produced materiel first. I think that that is a legitimate argument. But it only holds up so long,” he said.

“At some point, Ukraine — and the countries that will be able to support Ukraine with these types of systems — will run out of them, and you can’t replace them as easily. So at some point, you need to start thinking about Western supply chains that are based on Western western systems.”

Loss characterized Germany’s stance toward Ukraine as one of “immense” resistance to sending weapons unilaterally, and that it would prefer some kind of European coalition that jointly sends arms and assistance.

“Over the past six or four months, we’ve seen an immense reluctance both from the Chancellery and from the Defense Ministry to be proactive, to take the initiative and they’ve always referred to ‘not going it alone,'” Loss said, adding that Germany appeared to want the U.S. to take the lead and for Berlin to follow.