Site icon Rapid Telecast

Johnny Depp appeals against Amber Heard’s $2 million defamation trial payout, says few rulings of court ‘were erroneous’

Johnny Depp appeals against Amber Heard’s  million defamation trial payout, says few rulings of court ‘were erroneous’

Months after winning the defamation trial, actor Johnny Depp has now filed documents to appeal a Virginia court’s ruling that one of his lawyers defamed his ex-wife, actor Amber Heard. In the defamation case, Johnny was awarded $10.35 million in damages against Amber Heard. She was awarded $2 million by the Virginia jury in a countersuit claim, during the same trial. (Also Read | Johnny Depp looks unrecognisable as he shaves beard and moustache, fans ask if it’s for a new role)

The US lawsuit took place in a courtroom in Virginia, during the course of April and May this year. It was based on the allegation that Amber had defamed Johnny by referring to herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse” in a 2018 op-ed for the Washington Post. Although the op-ed did not specifically refer to Johnny, he claimed it harmed his reputation and wrecked his career.

As per Fox News, it reviewed Johnny’s documents which read that the court “should reverse the judgment on Ms Heard’s counterclaim”. He added that otherwise, he was in favour of the jury’s decision. “The jury’s emphatic favorable verdict on all three defamatory statements alleged in his complaint fully vindicated Mr Depp and restored his reputation. However, the trial court was confronted with a number of novel and complex legal and factual issues, and although the trial court decided the vast majority of those issues sensibly and correctly, a few rulings were erroneous,” it read.

The jury had agreed with Amber that Johnny was “vicariously liable” for comments made by his attorney to a tabloid in 2020. His lawyers, in his appeal, have argued that since Adam Waldman was hired as an independent contractor, Johnny wasn’t responsible for his remarks. The latest document read, “No evidence of Mr Waldman’s actual malice was presented at trial, so the judgment against Mr Depp cannot be sustained.” As per the report, Johnny’s team also argued Adam’s words were a “non-actionable statement of opinion insufficient to support a claim of defamation”.

Johnny and Amber separated a year before the op-ed was published, following two years of marriage. She said that Johnny had subjected her to emotional, physical, and sexual abuse during their relationship.

Stay connected with us on social media platform for instant update click here to join our  Twitter, & Facebook

We are now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TechiUpdate) and stay updated with the latest Technology headlines.

For all the latest Hollywood News Click Here 

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Rapidtelecast.com is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – abuse@rapidtelecast.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
Exit mobile version