Stanford president resigns

Stanford University president Marc Tessier-Lavigne announced Wednesday morning that he will step down as leader of the university, following a review of allegations of misconduct related to the authenticity of images published in scientific papers he co-authored.

While a months-long investigation by a committee of the University’s Board of Trustees concluded that he did not personally engage in any fraud or falsification of scientific data and did not find evidence that he was aware of misconduct by others prior to publication of the papers, it identified instances of manipulation of research data by others in his lab and found that Tessier-Lavigne should have been more diligent when seeking corrections.

“For the good of the University, I have made the decision to step down as President,” Tessier-Lavigne said in a statement.  He will leave on August 31.

The Board has named Richard Saller as interim president of the University beginning September 1. Professor of European Studies, Saller was previously dean of the university’s School of Humanities and Sciences as well as a provost and dean at the University of Chicago.

According to Jerry Yang, chair of the Stanford Board of Trustees, Tessier-Lavigne is stepping down “in light of the report and its impact on his ability to lead Stanford.”

The allegations against Tessier-Lavigne, first described on the website PubPeer and reported by the Stanford Daily, focused on concerns related to twelve scientific papers. Dr. Tessier-Lavigne was a principal author on five of those papers. Typically, the principal author oversees the production of the data and the experimental design on an ongoing basis — daily, weekly, or monthly, according to experts.

The concerns did not suggest that the findings were bogus or that patients were harmed.The contested research was conducted prior to his 2016 recruitment from New York City’s Rockefeller University to lead Stanford University. Most of the papers in question are focused on the study of the development of neural connections in the brain.

In some papers, the images seem to have been manipulated. In one instance, an image appeared to have been duplicated, then flipped. Another image was copied. Still another contained a photo that creates a distorted perspective.  Some seem to be the result of intentional editing, while others were  errors due to poor labeling, miscommunication or careless lab work.

Science, funded by taxpayers, relies on integrity and builds on previous work. If papers contain erroneous images, deliberate or intentional, researchers may waste time or money trying to replicate the results.

Tessier-Lavigne will remain on the Stanford faculty and continue his scientific research on brain development and neurodegeneration, he said. His work is focused on the cause and treatment of degenerative brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, as well as on therapies for spinal cord injuries. He also studies how defects in neural development lead to illness, disability and death.

Stanford’s Board of Trustees has assembled a special committee to investigate the claims. Its members include Jerry Yang of Yahoo; Carol C. Lam, general counsel at Qualcomm, Inc.; Jeffrey E. Stone, a senior partner at the international law firm McDermott Will & Emery, and James Coulter of the private equity giant TPG.