State Supreme Court agrees to hear UC Berkeley proposal for People’s Park

0

The Supreme Court of California agreed Wednesday to consider UC Berkeley regents’ petition to develop the university’s People’s Park site, setting aside a lower-court ruling earlier this year pushing school officials to study alternative sites.

The university has long sought to construct housing with 1,100 beds for students, as well as a 125-unit building for extremely low-income, unhoused or formerly housed people, on the 2.8-acre site. A developer for that project pulled out of consideration just last week.

People's Park is seen from this drone view in Berkeley, Calif., on Wednesday, August 3, 2022. Protesters tore down a fence that UC Berkeley had erected around the park after more trees were cut down to make way for student housing. (Jane Tyska/Bay Area News Group)
People’s Park is seen from this drone view in Berkeley, Calif., on Wednesday, August 3, 2022. Protesters tore down a fence that UC Berkeley had erected around the park after more trees were cut down to make way for student housing. (Jane Tyska/Bay Area News Group) 

In a February ruling, the state’s First District Court of Appeals had sided with two neighborhood nonprofits, Make UC a Good Neighbor and the People’s Park Historic Advocacy Group, who filed suit in 2021 to try to preserve the park.

The university only houses 23% of its students — the lowest percentage across the UC system’s ten campuses. As part of its long-term efforts to increase student housing, the park has been one of several sites on the university’s long-range development plan adopted in 2021.

The park proposal, approved at $312 million, became a lightning rod anew after a July 2022 decision by an Alameda County Superior Court judge that UC’s housing plans did not violate CEQA. The following month, the university spent $4 million during a standoff between police and protesters after attempts to fence off and clear the park.

UC spokesman Dan Mogulof greeted the Supreme Court ruling Wednesday with guarded warmth: “This is a very positive  and very welcome development. However, given that we do not yet know the full scope of the Supreme Court’s review, we will, for the time being, refrain from further comment.”

Check back for updates.

Contact George Kelly at 408-859-5180.

Stay connected with us on social media platform for instant update click here to join our  Twitter, & Facebook

We are now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TechiUpdate) and stay updated with the latest Technology headlines.

For all the latest Education News Click Here 

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Rapidtelecast.com is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
Leave a comment