The antitrust class action says owners “suffer lengthy delays in repairing” their EVs, and overpay for the fixes, too
Article content
Tesla was sued by customers who claim they’ve been forced to pay exorbitant prices and endure long waits for car repairs due to the company’s monopolization of replacement parts and maintenance services.
Advertisement 2
Article content
The antitrust class action was filed Tuesday in San Francisco federal court on behalf of Virginia M. Lambrix, who lives in Sonoma County and owns a Tesla Model S. She says owners of traditional combustion-engine cars have multiple options for maintenance and repairs, or do the work themselves. Those repairs can rely on parts from the original manufacturer; or parts made by other companies, according to the complaint.
Tesla owners, on the other hand, have just one option: getting their cars serviced by the company or a network of Tesla-approved service centers using only Tesla parts, according to the complaint, which cites federal antitrust laws. Lambrix argues the limitation is due to Tesla leveraging its market power to restrain repair and maintenance services.
Advertisement 3
Article content
Learn more about the cars
-
2023 Tesla Model 3
![]()
MSRP $54,990 to $72,990
-
2023 Tesla Model Y
![]()
MSRP $69,990 to $75,990
-
2023 Tesla Model S
![]()
MSRP $122,990 to $149,990
-
2023 Tesla Model X
![]()
MSRP $142,990 to $156,990
Recommended from Editorial
-
![Lexus, NAPA rate highest for vehicle repair satisfaction: J.D. Power]()
Lexus, NAPA rate highest for vehicle repair satisfaction: J.D. Power
-
![Tesla, insurers take different paths to deal with expensive repairs]()
Tesla, insurers take different paths to deal with expensive repairs
The practices have caused Tesla owners “to suffer lengthy delays in repairing or maintaining their electric vehicles, only to pay supracompetitive prices for those parts and repairs once they are finally provided,” according to the complaint.
Tesla didn’t immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. The carmaker reported US$6.09 billion of services and other automotive revenue last year, which included paid use of its Superchargers, insurance services, and merchandise sales.
The case is Lambrix v. Tesla, 23-cv-01145, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
Bloomberg
Stay connected with us on social media platform for instant update click here to join our Twitter, & Facebook
We are now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TechiUpdate) and stay updated with the latest Technology headlines.
For all the latest Automobiles News Click Here
Comments
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
Join the Conversation